General Information

Government Type

Municipality

Entity

Grantsville

Public Body

Grantsville City Planning Commission

Notice Information

Add Notice to Calendar

Notice Title

September 14, 2017 Planning Meeting

Notice Tags

Public Meetings

Notice Type(s)

Meeting, Hearing

Event Start Date & Time

September 14, 2017 07:00 PM

Event End Date & Time

September 14, 2017 08:30 PM

Description/Agenda

MINUTES OF THE GRANTSVILLE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION HELD 09/14/2017. The meeting was held in the Grantsville City Council Chambers at 429 E. Main Street in Grantsville, Utah. Those present were Commission Chairman Jaime Topham, Commission Members Gary Pinkham, and Robbie Palmer, Council Liaison Neil Critchlow, Attorney Brett Coombs, and Zoning Administrator Kristy Clark. Absent was Commission Members Scott Stice and Erik Stromberg. Also present was Barbara Grygierczyk, Norma Polk, Mark Waddell, Todd Castagno, Chris Cole, Corey Child (Ensign Eng.), Jeff Neal, Blaine Boyer, Treasa Silva, Helen Boyer, Kolten Kinsman, RT Brown, Barry Bunderson, Andy Warr, Josh, Alexis Leonelli, Ed Watson, Shane Watson, Guy Haskell, Scott DeHaan, Dean Johnson and Brad Clayton with Grantsville Fire Department. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 7:01 P.M. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. Proposed conditional use permit and related site plan for Integrated Builders Group, Inc. to build a financial institution with drive-thru facilities located at 458 East Main Street in the CD zone. The public hearing was opened by Chairman Topham at 7:01 p.m. and she called for comments. Blaine Boyer spoke on behalf of his mother Helen Boyer who lives at 474 E Main next to the Credit Union proposed site. Blaine provided the Commission, Attorney, Fire Marshall, Jewel Allen, and Kristy Clark with a copy of their concerns and issues with the proposed site of the Credit Union. Barbara Grygierczyk wants an egress and ingress. She also wants an existing turn lane off Main Street. She is concerned about the safety for herself and others being able to turn into the proposed Credit Union and is worried of possible congestion. She is worried about the light pole and the light being diffused onto her property and the Boyer property. She is also concerned that the ingress is too close to the property line of the adjacent property and she states that it is a safety issue. With no further comments being offered, Chairman Topham closed the public hearing at 7:13 p.m. b. Proposed rezoning of 16.66 acres of land at approximately 550 West Apple Street for Edward and Karen Watson and Alexi Leonelli to go from an A-10 zone to a R-1-21 zone. The public hearing was opened by Chairman Topham at 7:13 p.m. and she called for comments. With no comments being offered, Chairman Topham closed the public hearing at 7:13 p.m. c. Proposed minor subdivision for Norma Polk dividing 19.87 acres of land from one (1) lot into three (3) lots at 225 East Pear Street in the R-1-21 zone. The public hearing was opened by Chairman Topham at 7:14 p.m. and she called for comments. With no comments being offered, Chairman Topham closed the public hearing at 7:14 p.m. d. Proposed minor subdivision for the SR112 Development Group dividing 4.94 acres of land from one (1) lot into four (4) lots at 490 North Burmester Road in the RR-1 zone. The public hearing was opened by Chairman Topham at 7:14 p.m. and she called for comments. With no comments being offered, Chairman Topham closed the public hearing at 7:14 p.m. e. Proposed concept plan for Grantsville Property, LLC and Todd Castagno on the Oquirrh Estates Subdivision at 1193 East SR112 for the creation of ninety-nine (99) lots in the RM-15 zone. The public hearing was opened by Chairman Topham at 7:15 p.m. and she called for comments. Barbara Grygierczyk wanted verification of where 1193 was located. Chairman Topham stated that it sits back off SR-112. With no comments being offered, Chairman Topham closed the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. f. Proposed final plat amendment on the K&L Minor Subdivision for Kolten and Melinda Kinsman at 652 South Quirk Street to move Lot 101 in a more southerly direction. The public hearing was opened by Chairman Topham at 7:15 p.m. and she called for comments. With no comments being offered, Chairman Topham closed the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. THE MEETING WAS OFFICIALLY CALLED TO ORDER BY CHAIRMAN, JAIME TOPHAM, AT 7:16 P.M. 1. Consideration of a conditional use permit and related site plan for Integrated Builders Group, Inc. to build a financial institution with drive-thru facilities located at 458 East Main Street in the CD zone. Mark Waddell represented this item for Integrated Builders Group, Inc. and he stated to the Commission: I would like to address some of the comments of the public. I hope that I can explain to you where we are. I want to start with William's comments (Blaine Boyer). A Geological Engineer has reviewed the site. We are going to do whatever needs to be done to remove the water from the property and if it requires a catch basin, we absolutely will. As far as the sidewalk, curb and gutter we have already conceded and we will be putting that in as per UDOT's request which will align with the Credit Union up the street about 600 ft. An 8ft fence with a footing and stem wall around the property concerned with vehicle lights it is not in the current design. There is an existing fence on the property and there is a cost impact to do that. If it is necessary, obviously, the Credit Union is going to consider it and they need to do to accommodate the need. As far as the trees, the landscape designer has picked and selected the trees recommend for the area. We can find out the maturity and size and work with you on that. On to the concern of the South end of the property and putting a fence all the way around the property. The only concern with that is, and maybe what needs to be addressed, is that it is a 2.08-acre property and the Credit Union is only going to occupy the front third of the property there are all sorts of considerations of what to do with the back of the property whether to sell it off, hold it, develop it later, I know that there is interest maybe others buying the back of the property. It would limit the development of the back of the property that is already zoned commercial. That is the future intent of the entire corridor, as I understand it. I would like to get to Barbara's issues. Her concerns are with the egress and ingress. We originally planned this with two points of egress and ingress on both sides of the property. UDOT wants to minimize the amount of driveways from the highway. I would like to address your point in two ways. The reason the single egress/ingress was put to one side is UDOT wants to ideally force or dictate future landowners to share egress and ingress. They want future developments would need to come and talk to American United and come to an agreement and to share the access. They want people to have to slow down less often to turn into a driveway. UDOT also requested that we develop a roadway from the new curb and gutter out to the existing roadway the future of the highway is going to be a 5-lane highway. We have already conceded that we are going to develop that because UDOT is going to require it. Robbie Palmer speaks to Mark Waddel and thanks him for explaining everything a very professional way. Chairman Topham states that a letter from Aqua Engineering with specific items there six (6) of them. That would need to be dealt with or corrected before we make an approval or a condition for approval. Mark Waddel stated that we have done item #1. Item #2 will be incorporated in and shown on sheet C-1. Item #3 the height of the structure we have already added it to the plans. Item #4 proposed signs. We have been talking to the sign company and we will meet any and all requirements from the local codes listed on the sign ordinance. Item #5 we will absolutely add the calculations for the storm runoff. Item #6 we will provide the UDOT encroachment permit. And there are no traffic analyses required by UDOT we have already meet with them. Gary Pinkham wants them to address issues like a privacy fence and the lighting will need to be addressed on your next proposal and to show you are addressing the neighbors' concerns. Chairman Topham motioned to approve the consideration of a conditional use permit and related site plan for Integrated Builders Group, Inc. to build a financial institution with drive-thru facilities located at 458 East Main Street in the CD zone. On the condition that Aqua Engineering notes be corrected on the next set of plans. Robbie Palmer seconded the motion. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative and the motion carried. 2. Consideration of a rezone of 16.66 acres of land at approximately 550 West Apple Street for Edward and Karen Watson and Alexis Leonelli to go from an A-10 zone to a R-1-21 zone. Alexis Leonelli represented this item for consideration of a rezone and stated to the Commission: Alexis Leonelli we are requesting a zone change from A-10 to R-1-21. Chairman Topham states that they recently had a discussion about these type of changes and the impact that they have on our city. They are currently on our master plan, utilities plan, and our capital facilities plan with you having subdivisions next to you already this type of zone looks to be consistent. Gary Pinkham and Chairman Topham talk about the master plan and future subdivisions impacting the sewer and Gary reminds the commission that this is just a rezone. Alexis mentions that they have improved Apple street on our own and we actually own that and we have improved the street all the way up into the Cherry Blossom area which includes the water, sewer and the electrical we've done that along with this rezone. Gary moved to motion the rezone of 16.66 acres of land at approximately 550 West Apple Street for Edward and Karen Watson and Alexis Leonelli to go from an A-10 zone to a R-1-21 zone. Robbie Palmer seconded the motion. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative and the motion carried. 3. Consideration of a minor subdivision for Norma Polk dividing 19.87 acres of land from one (1) lot into three (3) lots at 225 East Pear Street in the R-1-21 zone. Cory Childs from Ensign Engineering represented this item for consideration of a minor subdivision for Norma Polk and stated to the Commission: Stated that he was ready for any questions from the commission. Robbie stated that there wasn't much public input on it. Attorney Brett Coombs stated that on the back of the last page under tab 3 there is a note from the public. Robbie Palmer motioned to approve the consideration of a minor subdivision for Norma Polk dividing 19.87 acres of land from one (1) lot into three (3) lots at 225 East Pear Street in the R-1-21 zone. Gary Pinkham seconded the motion. Attorney Brett Coombs added that any further development will make it a Major Sub. Cory Childs stated that he understood. Chairman Topham stated that the item has been motioned has been made and seconded. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative and the motion carried 4. Consideration of a minor subdivision for the SR112 Development Group dividing 4.94 acres of land from one (1) lot into four (4) lots at 490 North Burmester Road in the RR-1 zone. Austin Allred represented this item for the SR112 Development Group consideration of a minor subdivision and stated to the Commission: Chairman Topham stated that Agua Engineering has sewer line issues. Austin stated that he has meet with Mayor Marshall we are required to install an 8' sewer and the Mayor wants us to upsize the sewer for future capacity and Agua agrees with that. And we have meet with our development group to get prices for the cost to upsize both the water and the sewer. So we bring the sewer from the north and water from the south and he wants us to get the price difference of what the city would pay to upsize both those systems. Gary Pinkham asked if this is going to be consistent with Aqua's future needs? Austin answered yes. Gary Pinkham stated if we approve the Minor we are going to require a good deal more engineering than our ordinances call for cause it's going to get you into bonding issues. Austin stated that everyone has approved this. Such as Tooele County, public utilities, Fire Department. Barry Bunderson with Civil Projects Engineer on the project added that typically with a Minor subdivision were are not looking at engineering on water, sewer kind of drawings I have prepared them, they have been reviewed by Craig Neeley unofficially, he had some comments and we have addressed them as far as the connection water main on North street how that should be done going from a 6' water line to a 12' water line. There has been some review not formally in the process that you would think when something would be a Major subdivision. Gary Pinkham mentions that there is going to be a lot more inspections, permitting and bonding issues than of a typical Minor. Robbie Palmer states that it can go forward as a Minor but there would be additional requirements that would address those things. Chairman Topham mentioned that the commission only have a memo from Aqua Engineering and we don't have the benefit of Craig sitting here any type of approval with have to add that additional language and it has to be corrected by the time you get to the City Council. Barry Bunderson says that this is a benefit to the city in the regards that we are going to bring the water down Burmester to help the community with some fire risks. The project cost to upsize is really small compared to the overall benefit for the city. Gary motion to approve the minor subdivision for the SR112 Development Group dividing 4.94 acres of land from one (1) lot into four (4) lots at 490 North Burmester Road in the RR-1 zone. With the condition that they provide engineered drawings for the sewer and water meeting all off-site improvements necessary and meeting the City's requirements for permitting fees, inspection and bonding. Robbie seconded the motion. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative and the motion carried. 5. Consideration of a concept plan for Grantsville Property, LLC and Todd Castagno on the Oquirrh Estates Subdivision at 1193 East SR112 for the creation of ninety-nine (99) lots in the RM-15 zone. Todd Castagno represented this item for the Grantsville Property, LLC on the Oquirrh Estates Subdivision and he stated to the Commission: Todd Castagno states we came forward with a minor subdivision several months ago breaking this property up into 4 smaller lots. The original developers back in 2007-2008 were envisioning doing this whole project all the same time. So we came back with the minor breaking out the footprint for the single family, multi-family, and the commercial separate from one another so we could tackle each issue independently. So now we are coming back with the concept plan for the single family homes. Gary asks if the water and sewer is coming from Durfee street? Todd stated that on the water memorandum from Aqua Engineering states that we are fine to bring the water from Durfee street for the single family lots but at some future point we would need to tie into the line going to Deseret Peak and come back from the south. In phase 1 there is a church site and we have been working with the LDS Church and talking to Craig Neely the ordinance states that when you are over 30 lots that you are required two points of access. The church has indicated that their intent is acquire the parcel in 2018 but plans to build probably the earliest 2020. We would propose that we would most likely have the 2nd access already in by at least prior to occupancy of the church or by the commencement of phase 2 whichever comes first. Gary asked what is your time frame for the other halves of these two streets Lamb Land and Big Canyon? Todd states that Big Canyon we currently anticipated building half of it out to SR-112 Gary the problem with half is you only have 16ft asphalt. Todd half of each side instead of the full width back. Gary south of the property which appears to be the center of the street after park strip, curb & gutter, sidewalk you're only getting 16 ft. of asphalt which doesn't get us to the 24 ft. minimum that we require. At this point in time I don't think that Big Canyon is developed to full width. And Lamb Ln is similar it is brought in as a 2nd access and is supposed to have a 66ft Right-A-Way and you're at 33ft. which is half the width and that is only 1 lane of asphalt. Aqua mentions that you need to fill both streets especially if you are going to put 100 lots and a church. Jaime it looks like you are planning on putting a road on land that doesn't belong to you. Todd we are working with a plan brought forth exactly as it was before so we are working with the adjacent land owners. We are in discussions with most not all we have not been able to track down all of the owners. Gary if I remember right the owner to the East his intentions were to join with the developers of Oquirrh Estates at that time were on board to go forward at the that time. Gary is there any advantage having Bear Hollow go into cult-a-sacks rather than taking them out and having them tie them in to land to Big Canyon. If you live in a cross street all the way through might actually pick up a couple lots you've got 700 - 800 ft. cross street plus the ground in the cult-a-sacks vs a couple 100 ft. additional street to tie in the existing and get rid of the cult-a-sack and then you have flow through there. Gary the two major concerns that I have would be making sure that Lamb and Big Canyon get built out as we go and don't push a one lane road for the residents and for emergency services. The other thing would be to fairly quickly get the secondary water point. Todd I don't know if Aqua addressed that with the water. He did state that the 10' line would be suitable for the single family. Jaime I have an issue with approving a concept plan building a road on someone else's property. You mentioned discussions, what kind of discussions? Todd we have drafted easement agreements and are waiting for them to be signed. We could bring those roads in if we have to. Jaime I would feel better approving this if I see a change in the plans or documents from the homeowners. Robbie where they aren't planning not coming forward for a while maybe it something that we could table giving them time to do some of the things that they need to do. It would give them time to get those letters and meet with Craig Neeley. Gary if we table the conditions that I would be looking at would be that Lamb and Big Canyon get built to full width and that the second water tie in be done and also a study be done for the capacity issues of the sewer and water. Todd the sewer study I could see that being problematic and we aren't opposed to doing it but are we guaranteed those connections. I agree that the sewer study needs to be done and I would rather do it at the preliminary plat. Robbie motioned to table the consideration of a concept plan for Grantsville Property, LLC and Todd Castagno on the Oquirrh Estates Subdivision at 1193 East SR112 for the creation of ninety-nine (99) lots in the RM-15 zone. Gary seconded the motion. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative and the motion carried. 6. Consideration of a preliminary plat on ten (10) lots of the Clover Meadows Subdivision for Hawthorne House Investments, LLC and Ginger Built, LLC. Barry Bunderson represented this item and he stated to the Commission: We have been through the process with Craig Neeley and have received a clean memo. We have meet all the requirements. Commission really liked the plat layout. Barry wanted to go on record to thank the City for working with us on this. Craig Neeley has been good to go back and forth with, along with Jennifer Williams and Kristy Clark to be able to get this on the meeting tonight. Jaime motioned to approve the preliminary plat on ten (10) lots of the Clover Meadows Subdivision for Hawthorne House Investments, LLC and Ginger Built, LLC. Robbie Palmer seconded the motion. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative and the motion carried. 7. Consideration of a final plat amendment on the K&L Minor Subdivision for Kolten and Melinda Kinsman at 652 South Quirk Street to move Lot 101 in a more southerly direction. Kolten Kinsman represented this item for K&L Minor Subdivision and stated to the Commission: Chairman Topham asked are we really talking about 202 not 101? Kolton stated that he did not have anything in front of me. Chairman Topham mentions that it is actually 201. Gary Pinkham mentions the lot looks to be 201, 202, 103 on the drawing. Kolton mentions that it is 201 that is changing and that it was originally an acre lot and it remains an acre lot. Robbie Palmer states that this s a tricky situation you've meet the requirements and have been approved and the footage hasn't changed the amount of lots haven't changed. But there is that question if we let people get with not running curb and gutter down the side of their property and leaving their frontages short as they can because it is about money do we continue allow that if we allow that are we going to open ourselves up for more of that to happen. That is just my concern. Robbie motioned to approve consideration of a final plat amendment on the K&L Minor Subdivision for Kolten and Melinda Kinsman at 652 South Quirk Street to move Lot 201 in a more southerly direction. Chairman Topham seconded the motion. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative and the motion carried. 8. Consideration of a final plat approval for Willow Springs Subdivision Phase 3, which contains twenty-four (24) lots, for IRA Services et al and Todd Castagno. Todd Castagno represented this item for Willow Springs Subdivision Phase 3 and he stated to the Commission: This is the final. Robbie Palmer motion to approve the consideration of a final plat approval. Gary Pinkham seconded the motion for Willow Springs Subdivision Phase 3, which contains twenty-four (24) lots, for IRA Services et al and Todd Castagno. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative and the motion carried. 9. Consideration of a final plat approval for Anderson Farms Subdivision Phase 2, which contains twenty-nine (29) lots for Gene Anderson, Rhett Marshall, and Todd Castagno. Todd Castagno represented this item for final plat approval for Anderson Farms Phase 2 and stated to the Commission: Trying to get ahead of the game before winter gets here. Robbie Palmer motioned to approve the consideration of a final plat approval for Anderson Farms Subdivision Phase 2, which contains twenty-nine (29) lots for Gene Anderson, Rhett Marshall, and Todd Castagno. Gary Pinkham seconded the motion. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative and the motion carried. 10. Consideration of a six (6) month extension for Guy Haskell on the Deseret Highland Subdivision Concept Plan. Guy Haskell represented this item for consideration of 6 months for the Deseret Highland Subdivision Concept plan and he stated to the Commission: I just want to let you know where we are at with this. We had the concept approval proposed about 6 months ago and within 3weeks we had all of the drawings to move forward and still have all the drawings. But Jennifer Williams at the time mention we had to have the UDOT permit in hand to be able to submit the drawings and application. And we have been working on that. We didn't know this at the time evidently that there is a 20ft easement beyond the right a way of UDOT that goes onto our property. And if you remember also we came in with 2 big storm retention areas and they just so happen to get moved into that 20ft easement. UDOT had concerns to whether or not we could put them in the easement. It has been determined that we can put them in their easement and that we can move forward. But this has to go in front of 6 engineers and all have approved this except one. Who has concerns about the clear zone. Where if a car gets into an accident that there is so many feet available that if it goes off the road that it isn't going to hit anything. There has to be 40ft off of the Right-A-Way and we have 34ft so we are only 6ft off. So last thing that we debating on this clear zone before we even get our permit is whether or not if we can put fences right on our property line or if they have to come off that clear zone that's all we have left on UDOT and the plans have been drawn and ready to turn in and have been for 5 months. Gary moved to approve the extension of 6 months. Robbie seconded the motion. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative and the motion carried. 11. Approval of minutes of the previous business meeting in August: Gary moved to approve the minutes of the August meeting. Robbie seconded the motion. Jaime abstained. The voting was unanimous in the affirmative and the motion carried. 12. Report from Council Liaison Member Jewel Allen: Councilman Allen stated Next work meeting 2nd week of October 10. 5:30 with CC. 3hrs 13. Adjourn: Gary moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:30 p.m. Robbie seconded the motion. All voted in favor and the meeting adjourned. Kristy Clark Zoning Administrator

Notice of Special Accommodations (ADA)

In compliance with the American with Disability Act, Grantsville City will accommodate reasonable requests to assist the disabled to participate in meetings. Requests for assistance may be made by calling City Hall at least 3 days in advance of the meeting that will be attended at (435) 884-3411.

Notice of Electronic or Telephone Participation

NA

Meeting Information

Meeting Location

429 E Main Street
Grantsville, 84029
Show in Apple Maps Show in Google Maps

Notice Posting Details

Notice Posted On

October 17, 2017 11:16 AM

Notice Last Edited On

October 17, 2017 11:16 AM

Subscribe by Email

Subscription options will send you alerts regarding future notices posted by this Body.